Pets or No Pets? Pros and Cons for Landlords

by Chris on March 18, 2013

Pets or no pets? That’s a question every landlord must consider.

Each policy has its own unique benefits, and neither option is trouble-free.

Pros and Cons of ‘No Pets’ Policies

Pros: A no pets policy pleases many tenants, especially those whose schedules don’t accommodate barking dogs, those with fears or phobias about animals, and current or future tenants who may suffer from pet allergies.

Having no pets on the premises may reduce the risk of damage to the property, eliminate arguments over pet waste, and cut down on disputes between tenants. It also eliminates the rare but serious risk that an animal will attack and the landlord could be held liable for having allowed the pet.

Cons: Pets are popular, and a no pets policy can limit the pool of available applicants. That can lead to longer vacancies, and income loss.

A no pets policy requires diligent enforcement. Every violation must be prosecuted the same way, or the landlord appears to be discriminating. Lack of action may be interpreted as having abandoned the policy.

A no pets policy doesn’t anticipate the situation where a tenant brings in a pet after leasing. A landlord may not be able to evict the tenant who violates the policy. Under some local practices, a landlord may not be able to evict a tenant for a no pets violation unless the animal is actually causing harm. Judges do not always agree that violating the pet policy is a serious breach of the lease agreement. If that happens, the pet remains, with no rules regarding its conduct.

Advantages and Disadvantages of Allowing Pets

Pros: By anticipating pets in the unit, a landlord can prepare the property to minimize foreseeable damage — like lifting carpets, installing door protectors, or designating a dog walking area.

A pets policy can set forth limits on pets and pet behaviors.

Accommodating pets is known to increase tenant retention.

Cons: Sometimes animals cause damage, and the security deposit may not be enough to cover, forcing the landlord to pursue legal action against a tenant.

Despite the set policies, it is difficult to anticipate everything that could happen and provide rules to limit exposure or income loss.

More rules mean more enforcement — and that increases time spent managing properties.

No one option offers a panacea for handling pets in rental properties. When deciding on a policy, it may be helpful to speak with other landlords and share strategies.

Also, if pets are allowed, animal experts suggest that landlords focus on screening the tenant, not the pet. Landlords should ask questions that reveal how responsible the tenant is as a pet owner before deciding whether to allow the animal and owner into the rental. For a list of questions to ask tenants who have pets, see our blog post How to Screen Tenants With Pets.

This post is provided by Tenant Verification Service, Inc., helping landlords reduce the risks of renting with fraud prevention tools that include Tenant Screening, Tenant Background Checks, (U.S. and Canada), as well as Criminal Background Checks, and Eviction Reports (U.S. only).

Click Here to Receive Landlord Credit Reports.

Disclaimer: The information provided in this post in not intended to be construed as legal advice, nor should it be considered a substitute for obtaining individual legal counsel or consulting your local, state, federal or provincial tenancy laws.

{ 1 comment… read it below or add one }

cindy March 19, 2013 at 5:24 pm

The reason we don’t rent to pets is for allergies. Once a unit has been inhabited by a dog or cat, you cannot rent to someone with pet allergies safely, no matter how much you clean it. We take the no-pet-allergen idea very seriously, because there are very few (if any) units available to folks with pet allergies.

Leave a Comment

Previous post:

Next post: