Ontario’s Human Rights Commission Opposes City’s New Rental Bylaw

by Chris on May 23, 2011

Ontario’s Human Rights Commission Chief is speaking out about a rental  bylaw in Waterloo.

Her concerns include stringent new occupancy standards and burdensome licensing requirements that could discourage landlords from offering much- needed rental housing.

A bylaw change was approved by Waterloo’s City Council two weeks ago, and includes bedroom caps on rentals, and onerous requirements for licensing, including size metrics on bedrooms and extremely high fines for failure to comply. Other bylaws in effect include minimum separation distances which restrict the number of rentals in some neighborhoods.

OHRC’s Chief Commissioner Barbara Hall, in statements prepared to address the City Council, admits that while the OHRC is not in the business of drafting licence requirements for landlords, the office is experienced in identifying legislation that could violate the Human Rights Code.

Waterloo’s council suggests that limiting the number of bedrooms in general rental housing resolves a safety issue, and that greater scrutiny is needed to ensure the safety of people in bigger homes.

But Hall points out, “if you follow this logic, you would need to have systems in place to also regulate the many similar houses in neighbourhoods that are not being rented out. After all, the families living in these homes should have an equal right to a safe place to live.”

The OHRC has repeatedly expressed concern that this bedroom cap could exclude certain Code-protected groups, such as large families with children, or extended families. According to the 2006 census, there were nearly half a million households in Ontario with 5 people or more, and it stands to reason that some of them live and rent in Waterloo.

The city’s response to this concern is to say that such Code-protected groups will not be adversely affected, as they will have access to boarding houses. But the OHRC points out that this is the very type of differential treatment which is one of the first things Tribunals look for when deciding if discrimination has taken place.

The proposed bylaw also includes a per bedroom occupancy limitation which is more restrictive than the existing Building Code. The OHRC expressed concern that it will become difficult, if not impossible, for people to share bedrooms in rental houses in Waterloo.

“People should be able to share a bedroom, if they choose, without the landlord or the City peeking through the keyhole,” Hall notes. “In fact, any related questioning or investigation could lead to human rights complaints.”

There is also concern over the effect of existing minimum separation distances between rentals that could limit where some renters can choose to live.

“Since the rental housing by-law effectively designates any housing with more than three bedrooms as a lodging house, you are basically telling anyone with a large or extended family that there are major limitations – or barriers, on where they can live. We view this as potentially contrary to the Ontario Human Rights Code, and I hope it is not the intent of this by-law,” Hall writes.

Ultimately, the concern boils down to whether there is an ulterior motive to the bylaw. Is it actually a veiled attempt to limit student housing in neighborhoods near college campuses?

Such “people-zoning”, as the OHRC calls it, may be discriminatory.

This post is provided by Tenant Verification Service, Inc., helping landlords reduce the risks of renting with fraud prevention tools that include Tenant Screening, Tenant Background Checks, (U.S. and Canada), as well as Criminal Background Checks, and Eviction Reports (U.S. only).

Click Here to Receive Landlord Credit Reports.


Disclaimer: The information provided in this post in not intended to be construed as legal advice, nor should it be considered a substitute for obtaining individual legal counsel or consulting your local, state, federal or provincial tenancy laws.

{ 1 comment… read it below or add one }

Bob Kwapis May 24, 2011 at 7:02 am

Re: Waterloo Housing by-law
I have a great concern about the impacts of the Waterloo By-law.
My daughter had just finished her first year at Wilfred Laurier, she stayed in campus residence as most of first year students do. Unfortunately the residence environment has been very disruptive to her studies mainly because of the continuous noise factor that is impossible to control.
We have decided to buy her a four bedroom single family home in Waterloo earlier this year, for her to move into in September. My daughter is focused on her studies and she is looking for three roommates that have the same focus and respect of their living environment.
This property is basically her house. Unfortunately on paper it is our house because she would not qualify for the mortgage as she is a student without income. I am not clear of the new by-law impact on my situation if my daughter gets her three roommates for a total of four people.
I am very concerned how this by-law can regulate someone’s freedom to a private and quiet right to live in a town of their choice near the University of their choice. I am also very upset and disappointed with this regulation as I truly agree that this is a serious infringement on our basic human rights and impacts to our freedom of choice of where to live.
Unfortunately, as most of the parents that are impacted by this decision do not reside in Waterloo therefore cannot attend the hearings that impact their children residency. This is a bad decision by the city council and I will not be surprised that it will force many parents to invest their hard earned money dedicated to their children’s education elsewhere, a town that understands and helps to support our future generation.

Leave a Comment

Previous post:

Next post: